HP is not giving up on Neoview yet?

Ventana Research CEO Mark Smith wrote on December 5, 2010 that HP was quietly quitting the Business Intelligence market. His article was also carried by InformationManagement.com.  A number of commentators agreed with Smith’s assessment.

Ventana Research is a well-known analyst outfit so it would seem HP will want to refute this assertion quickly if it was not true.  Granted the whole company was probably getting ready for its annual year end shutdown, but no company will let external commentary drive the narrative for its product line, especially not one as big as HP.

Finally, we see on December 13, 2010 that HP announced the hiring of an SAP executive and a denial that it was killing its Neoview data warehousing solution.   As other observers pointed out, Business Intelligence solutions have continued to attract investment by enterprises even during the trough of the bust in 2008~2009.  It will be unwise for HP to leave the market, even though the company has not made much of headway in selling Neoview.

This is a curious occurrence – an analyst making a pubic claim that HP was killing a product and HP finally got around to denying a week later.  Maybe there is more to come on this intrigue.  What do you think?


Posted in Business Intelligence, Enterprise Software | Tagged | Leave a comment

VC said Speed, Playfulness, Key to Successful Web Apps

Just saw this article on CIO magazine’s website, Speed, Playfulness, Key to Successful Web Apps.  Funny enough CIOs are usually more concerned with selecting enterprise software that almost never tout their speed or playfulness.  The new generation of web applications that are known for speed and playfulness, e.g. Twitter are usually the target for banning by the CIO.   It seems to be an ironic forum to talk about this topic.

Observe that the person being quoted is the venture capitalist who invested in Twitter, Foursquare, Boxee, Delicious and Feedburner.  Granted these companies have had a lot of users, their share of growing pains and even an exit event(Feedburner is now part of Google), I don’t know if we can say they are unqualifiedly successful yet.  Do you?

On the other hand, I do support the principle that software design should be driven by usability which usually includes quick response and delightful user experience. This is generally not in dispute but why do most enterprise software still look awful and a pain to use?  Here is just a blog exploring the whys, Is Simple Viable in Enterprise Land?

I suspect the separation of buying responsibility and user satisfaction encourages shenanigans from the vendors.  The people who sign on the dotted line often have goals not entirely aligned with the end users, a fact many vendors play to the max.  Any comments?

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Posted in Enterprise Software, Social Media, Software Development | Tagged , | 1 Comment